<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>principles &#8211; Manu Prasad</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.manuprasad.com/tag/principles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.manuprasad.com</link>
	<description>Manu Prasad &#124; Fractional CMO</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 04:28:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Next.org</title>
		<link>https://www.manuprasad.com/2011/02/03/next-org/</link>
					<comments>https://www.manuprasad.com/2011/02/03/next-org/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[manu prasad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 04:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[institution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[principles]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.manuprasad.com/blog/?p=3849</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A few days back, I happened to receive some understanding on the difference between an &#8216;organisation&#8217; and an &#8216;institution&#8217;. As is my wont, I immediately came back from the [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">A few days back, I happened to receive some understanding on the difference between an &#8216;organisation&#8217; and an &#8216;institution&#8217;. As is my wont, I immediately came back from the event and googled it. All the Q &amp; A forums, however, just sent me to Wikipedia, and to be fair, it did confirm what I had understood. So, the definitions</p>
<blockquote style="text-align: justify;"><p>An institution is any structure or mechanism of social order and cooperation governing the behavior of a set of individuals within a given human community. Institutions are identified with a social purpose and permanence, transcending individual human lives and intentions, and with the making and enforcing of rules governing cooperative human behavior.</p>
<p>An organization is a social arrangement which pursues collective goals, controls its own performance, and has a boundary separating it from its environment. ..There are a variety of legal types of organizations, including: corporations, governments, non-governmental organizations, international organizations, armed forces, charities, not-for-profit corporations, partnerships, cooperatives, and universities.</p></blockquote>
<p style="text-align: justify;">I think somewhere between the two lies the organisation of the future &#8211; where the collective intent of the workforce is more than the sum of the parts. I liked the &#8216;social purpose&#8217; part of the institution which to me, made it superior to the organisation that has a boundary that separates it from the environment. I felt that this boundary had become an increasingly impervious wall, something that affected intent, culture and even ideas. But I&#8217;m not so sure of the &#8216;permanence&#8217; of the institution.  Is it just the idea that&#8217;s permanent or the manifestations too?</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Let&#8217;s quickly bring back that &#8216;where is this going&#8217; thought into a brand perspective. When i wrote about appification and multiple platforms a fortnight back, I wondered what was the structure that could hold the identity of a brand together. Logos, mission statements, and even the experience &#8211; all of which have been used to define &#8216;brand&#8217; seemed unworthy. Even my favourite &#8211; &#8216;promise to the consumer&#8217; seemed barely there.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The bad news &#8211; I don&#8217;t have an answer yet. The good news &#8211; out there, (at least) a couple of razor sharp brains,  armed with much more experience and knowledge, are piecing together <a href="http://confusedofcalcutta.com/2011/01/17/the-maker-generation-in-the-enterprise/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">the principles that would guide the functioning of the enterprise</a>. The organisation is after all, a means to an end, and the brand is one of those means. So from that, I&#8217;m sure, clarity will emerge for brands too. <img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f642.png" alt="🙂" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">until next time, to boldly go where no enterprise has gone before <img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f609.png" alt="😉" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.manuprasad.com/2011/02/03/next-org/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
