<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>micro celebrities &#8211; Manu Prasad</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.manuprasad.com/tag/micro-celebrities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.manuprasad.com</link>
	<description>Manu Prasad &#124; Fractional CMO</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 05:21:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>The price of influence</title>
		<link>https://www.manuprasad.com/2012/07/26/the-price-of-influence/</link>
					<comments>https://www.manuprasad.com/2012/07/26/the-price-of-influence/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[manu prasad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 05:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[micro celebrities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trust]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.manuprasad.com/blog/?p=4740</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Speaking of trust, between a corporation and consumers, one of the earliest controlled version of &#8216;outsourcing&#8217; it was celebrity endorsements. I use &#8216;controlled&#8217; because organic WOM is not really [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://www.manuprasad.com/blog/2012/07/in-trust-we-trust/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Speaking of trust</a>, between a corporation and consumers, one of the earliest controlled version of &#8216;outsourcing&#8217; it was celebrity endorsements. I use &#8216;controlled&#8217; because organic WOM is not really in the corporation&#8217;s control. Though it is still in vogue, the credibility is possibly dented thanks to abuse by the endorser, the endorsed and a media that creates more ways to make an a$$ of the end consumer. eg. passing off ads as content.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In the era of social networks and lightweight interactions, the beneficiaries of this decline would be micro celebrities (MC from now) who have created their own circles of influence in specific domains. I remember <a href="http://www.manuprasad.com/blog/2009/04/a-plus-cases-on-twitter/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">writing about that</a> &#8211; over 3 years back, and following it up later with <a href="http://www.manuprasad.com/blog/2010/07/influence-cycles/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">influence cycles</a> and the <a href="http://www.manuprasad.com/blog/2011/07/influence-decision-making-data/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">tool based influence calculations</a> being used by brands for promotions. The platforms used by these celebrities could be any &#8211; twitter, blogs, Pinterest etc and it does allow the brand to customise their interactions basis the medium itself and with help from the MC, use the strengths of the medium to the hilt.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="https://manuscrypts.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/UTV.jpg" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-4841" title="UTV" src="https://manuscrypts.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/UTV-300x184.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="184" /></a>I was hoping that it would evolve such that brands would identify MCs who would be connected to their own category and therefore would wield their influence among people interested in that category. But judging by the directions the platforms are taking, the equations seem to be becoming closer to the earlier forms of media, and ignoring the social aspect. When <a href="http://twitter.com/vijaysankaran" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Vijay</a> shared <a href="http://india.sponsoredtweets.com/twitter_advertising/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">this</a> and pinky-swore that he wasn&#8217;t playing an April Fool prank, I was even more convinced of the direction. Full circle. Hopefully the lessons will be fast, and the new cycle will begin soon. <img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f642.png" alt="🙂" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">until next time, influenced?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.manuprasad.com/2012/07/26/the-price-of-influence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
