<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Facebook Backup &#8211; Manu Prasad</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.manuprasad.com/tag/facebook-backup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.manuprasad.com</link>
	<description>Manu Prasad &#124; Fractional CMO</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 04:21:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Facebook Groupie</title>
		<link>https://www.manuprasad.com/2010/10/14/facebook-groupie/</link>
					<comments>https://www.manuprasad.com/2010/10/14/facebook-groupie/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[manu prasad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 04:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[context]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook Backup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook groups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Reader]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.manuprasad.com/blog/?p=3709</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What kind of a blog would this be if we didn&#8217;t discuss Facebook&#8217;s new announcements. At a simplistic level, it would seem that Facebook learned a lot from that [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">What kind of a blog would this be if we didn&#8217;t discuss <a href="http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=434691727130" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Facebook&#8217;s new announcements</a>. At a simplistic level, it would seem that Facebook learned a lot from <a href="http://www.manuprasad.com/blog/2010/07/a-different-kind-of-social/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">that Google study</a>. (via a conversation with <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/ScepticGeek" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Mahendra</a>)</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Though i can&#8217;t access it yet, I&#8217;m very happy with the <a href="http://thenextweb.com/socialmedia/2010/10/06/facebook-launches-download-your-data/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">backup option</a>, and hope that its a step towards portability. The new chat availability &#8216;visualisation&#8217; seems slightly better than the old one. I can&#8217;t see the app dashboard yet.  But the other big announcement was the revamping of groups. I&#8217;d been categorising friends using lists for a while, but didn&#8217;t actually utilise them for anything specific. Though its easy to see this as a wall within a wall, from initial usage, I think the new Groups allow that one layer that needed to be added to generic &#8216;friendships&#8217; &#8211; context, not to mention better control over who sees what. And from what I see, I don&#8217;t even have to be friends with a person to share things and have a great conversation on a topic both of us like. There are <a href="http://www.labnol.org/internet/facebook-groups-benefits/17893/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">other advantages</a> too. Of course, there are a a few <a href="http://technmarketing.com/web/why-the-new-facebook-groups-suck-on-so-many-levels/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">issues</a>, and as always, Facebook kept everything as public as possible (as default) but changes in this version is as inevitable as the waves of outrage that follows all Facebook announcements.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">I&#8217;m still debating whether I&#8217;d like the Groups to be integrated better in the newsfeed (with ways to filter as per importance) or whether its current location (sidebar) is a better approach. From a signal-noise perspective, perhaps it should stay the way it is. I&#8217;m not very convinced about looking at Groups as &#8216;<a href="http://thenextweb.com/socialmedia/2010/10/07/with-new-facebook-groups-friendfeeds-gone-mainstream-two-years-late/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Friendfeed going mainstream</a>&#8216; or even <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2010/10/07/facebook-groups-google-wave/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Wave</a>. But that does make me wonder whether the next version will also have a feed aggregator, directly, or indirectly &#8211; allowing apps like Networked Blogs. That might actually get RSS to go mainstream. <img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f642.png" alt="🙂" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /> If that happens, I am also wondering about the implications on Google Reader, and actually any other network which serves as a content distribution/consumption channel.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Groups can be made &#8216;Secret&#8217;, and I&#8217;m still not sure how &#8216;Open&#8217; and &#8216;Closed&#8217; groups will show up in Facebook Search. Also, since I still don&#8217;t have access to Places, I can only wonder whether &#8216;Location&#8217; can also be made a group feature. I&#8217;m seeing both the above from a brand perspective. Would a brand, for example, be able to highlight a location specific group on their Page, as part of a local promo? Even if the brands do not get information about the groups, Facebook would still have it, and that would definitely help target ads better.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Groups are not really a silver bullet, but I don&#8217;t think Facebook is aiming for that now either. Its just that they&#8217;ve not missed the starting gun, to slice and dice my social graph &#8211; that&#8217;s useful for me, as well as advertisers.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">until next time, group on <img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f609.png" alt="😉" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.manuprasad.com/2010/10/14/facebook-groupie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
